Skip to content
CStonxBeta
Just1gr3edou

Just1gr3edou

France · Member since December 5, 2020

· Updated just now

FACEIT level 441,011 Elo Premier 12,904 Compare Offline
6Level
Not enough data
CStonx analysisA statistical measure of unusual performances, not proof of cheating.

Leetify showcase

Leetify Rating

-0.99

285 matches · 50% win rate

Aim77
Positioning53
Utility41
Clutch9.8%
Opening duels-0.4%
Head accuracy13.2%
Time to damage
541 ms
Preaim
8.4°
Spray
40.2%
Counter-strafe
82%
CT Leetify Rating
-1.82
T Leetify Rating
-0.27
Accuracy on spotted enemy
36.1%
Successful trades
48%
Utility on death
259
Wingman
11
First analysed match
6/17/2023
Premier
12,904

FACEIT showcase

ZinedZyw1Sh
FACEIT level 44

1,011

Elo · EU

Matches
11
Win rate
45%
K/D
0.89
HS
40%
ADR
76.7

Average of the last 11 matches

K/D
0.86
HS
37%
ADR
75.9
Win rate
45%

Longest streak: 2 wins

Recent maps

  • Dust IIDust II2/5
  • AncientAncient1/2
  • AnubisAnubis2/2
  • OverpassOverpass0/1
  • MirageMirage0/1

Last 11 results

Hover a result to see the match, click to open it on FACEIT.

Steam showcase

Lifetime total for the account, all modes
Kills
15,130
Deaths
16,680
K/D
0.91
HS
42.2%
Accuracy
2.5%
MVP
2,424
Matches
1,105
Wins
40%
Playtime
329 h

Favourite weapons

  • AK-473,549 kills
  • M4A42,450 kills
  • AWP1,804 kills
  • P20001,174 kills
  • SSG 081,015 kills

Last match

Kills / deaths
1 / 9
Damage
242
Rounds won
1 / 9
MVP
0
Wins
50%
Leetify
Matches analysed
285
Leetify
FACEIT K/D
0.89
FACEIT
FACEIT ADR
76.7
FACEIT
Head accuracy
13.2%
Leetify
Accuracy (Steam)
2.5%
Steam
FACEIT Elo
1,011
FACEIT

CStonx analysis

Not enough data
Not enough data
Risk
—/100
Trust
—
Confidence
21%

Coverage

1 match analysed · 18 rounds · 20 duels · from 10/27/2026 to 10/27/2026

Sources: FACEIT, Leetify, Steam, valve

Breakdown

  • Mechanical anomalies13/100 · Weight 40% · confidence 31%
  • Performance consistency8/100 · Weight 25% · confidence 18%
  • Evolution over timenot measured · Weight 15% · confidence 0%
  • Account signals4/100 · Weight 10% · confidence 40%
  • Contextual behaviournot measured · Weight 10% · confidence 0%

Observations

  • Preaim (Leetify) Leetify

    75th percentile of the reference population: above most players.

    Reference: all levels, 40 players, median 9.0°

    8.4°

  • Time to damage (Leetify) Leetify

    60th percentile of the reference population: within the norm.

    Reference: all levels, 40 players, median 568 ms

    541 ms

  • FACEIT ADR FACEIT

    49th percentile of the reference population: within the norm.

    Reference: FACEIT 4–6, 136 players, median 78.5

    76.7

  • FACEIT HS FACEIT

    48th percentile of the reference population: within the norm.

    Reference: FACEIT 4–6, 152 players, median 41.0%

    40.0%

  • Spray (Leetify) Leetify

    50th percentile of the reference population: within the norm.

    Reference: all levels, 40 players, median 40.2%

    40.2%

  • Account age Steam

    Old account.

    5 years

  • FACEIT K/D FACEIT

    35th percentile of the reference population: within the norm.

    Reference: FACEIT 4–6, 152 players, median 1.06

    0.89

  • Head accuracy (Leetify) Leetify

    10th percentile of the reference population: within the norm.

    Reference: all levels, 40 players, median 19.1%

    13.2%

  • Official sanctions Steam

    No known official sanction.

    0

History

No history yet.

A statistical measure of unusual performances, not proof of cheating. Experimental model: thresholds and weights are not calibrated on verified cases yet.

Model cstonx-trust-1 · computed just now

How to read the CStonx analysis

CStonx stats

Stats based on 1 match seen by CStonx · from 10/27/2026 to 10/27/2026

W – L
0 – 1
Win rate
0%
K/D
0.18
3 / 17
Kills / round
0.17
ADR
—
HS
66.7%
KAST
—
Opening duels
—
Clutches won
—
Utility damage / round
—
Flash assists
—
Shot accuracy
—

By platform

MatchesK/DADRWin rate
Valve10.18—0%

By map

MapMatchesWin rateK/DADR
CacheCache10%0.18—

These are not career stats: only the matches CStonx saw (Wingman aside), kept one year at most.

Progression leads

Findings from recorded matches and analysed demos, each with its data, sample size and confidence level. They are leads to check by rewatching the rounds, not a verdict.

Recent matches

  • CacheCache7 : 13Valve+0.47
  • Dust IIDust II5 : 13Valve-2.77
  • OfficeOffice13 : 6Valve-5.22
  • OfficeOffice8 : 5Valve-8.63
  • CacheCache11 : 13Valve-2.67
  • Dust IIDust II13 : 10Valve-1.24
  • CacheCache5 : 13Valve-10.98
  • MirageMirage13 : 11Valve+0.26
  • MirageMirage12 : 12Valve+2.08
  • CacheCache13 : 9Valve+3.83
  • InfernoInferno6 : 13Valve-5.27
  • Dust IIDust II12 : 12Valve-2.06
  • AnubisAnubis9 : 13Valve-3.48
  • Dust IIDust II13 : 9Valve-6.53
  • MirageMirage12 : 12Valve-2.37
  • OfficeOffice10 : 13Valve+8.37
  • AnubisAnubis13 : 9Valve-0.49
  • Dust IIDust II13 : 10Valve+7.05
  • CacheCache12 : 12Valve+0.90
  • InfernoInferno2 : 13Valve-11.99